Is Gravity Creating Matter?

Gravity Lensing Changes Light Path 


Einstein predicted that light from distant stars when seen at the edge of the sun would appear to bend slightly.

If we can, just for a moment, abandon the dogma of conservation of mass and energy, we may approach the problem of mass deficit more easily.

What happens inside a star? Is there a way to reverse Einstein’s energy from mass - to use energy - massive amounts - to create matter?


Black Holes - Star Fonts


Any spinning object has energy as per:
E = 1/2 mv^2

Einstein refined to state energy:
E = mc^2

Now, when a body spins, work is done. If you were to hitch up a kite or rig up a sail or a windmill we’d see how unlimited the energy of a large body such as our earth’s spin is.

Energy in the hot dense core of a star, or a supermassive black hole, as the body spins, might it be focused as with gravitational lensing, and condensed into matter?

Imagine wave energy being forced by a huge gravity well to bend, as Einstein famously predicted, but not just at the Sun's edge. Imagine in the core of the Milky Way a black hole the weight of fifty billion suns, like the one in the centre of many galaxies.

Blue Nuggets 

Recently it has been reported that at the edge of our view of the universe galaxies appear with supermassive black holes like our own - Blue Nuggets have few stars around them, however. That's perhaps what young galaxies look like, since these, being so far away, may only be viewed as they were billions of years ago. This helps in cementing our view of stars as emerging over time from the galacticore fusion process. Spinning out.

Blue Nugget galaxies have few stars

Galaxies like these Blue Nuggets must have been the standard at the beginning of the expansion of the universe since they are only seen at the very limits of our telescopes' powers. Light speed retards our ability to see current views of objects so far away in spacetime.

Light Lag Limits Viewing

Another question arises when factoring in light speed and viewing angles.  Unless viewed flat-on, that is, perfectly perpendicular to the galactic disk in question, light speed will cause a lag that will give a false view.  Stars behind the core send light later than those in front of the core, in cases where galaxies are viewed edge-on.  Starlight passing near the  core will be lensed more than light from edges. Any tilt in the disk viewing plane will of necessity create a false image.  We need computer algorithms to compensate for the variation in distance and provide more accurate models than can be had in real time.

One challenge given this stretch is to reevaluate current galaxy typology. Are 'elliptical galaxies' just spirals with gravitational lensing and light-speed lag effects blurring actual form?  Can the actual form ever be seen other than at perfect perpendicularity?



New Mass - From Spin Energy 

Imagine all the energy of spin lensing in the very densest core. Imagine rearranging Einstein’s formula and creating matter from spin energy:

E = mc^2
m = E/c^2

A lot of energy is needed but over time, spinning bodies might increase in mass.

A wave of energy is bent by gravity in the core of a black hole, forming links and chains, stable localized snippets made into packets. Equal pressure from all sides in the centre of the gravity well causes wave circularization - the most stable configuration. Prefusion quantum soup.  

It becomes quickly apparent that the problem of 'mass deficit' is merely a result of not seeing the masses of galaxies and stars as they appear in the present time.  We are limited to views of these as they were in the past, before mass increase.

Expanding Earth